Justices to weigh whether a prosecutor’s history of striking Black jurors violated constitutional safeguards in the conviction of death row inmate Terry Pitchford
The Supreme Court of the United States is set to hear a consequential death penalty case that could reshape how courts evaluate claims of racial discrimination in jury selection—a legal issue that has shadowed the American justice system for decades.
At the center of the case is Terry Pitchford, a Mississippi death row inmate convicted in connection with a 2004 robbery and killing. His appeal raises questions about whether his constitutional rights were violated when prosecutors removed nearly all Black prospective jurors from the panel that ultimately sentenced him to death.
The case brings renewed scrutiny to former Mississippi prosecutor Doug Evans, whose past conduct has already drawn rebuke from the high court. In 2019, the justices overturned the conviction of Curtis Flowers, citing what Justice Brett Kavanaugh described as a “relentless, determined effort” to exclude Black jurors.
Pitchford’s legal team argues that a similar pattern unfolded in his trial. Prosecutors struck four of the five remaining Black jurors during jury selection, leaving only one Black juror on the panel. Defense attorneys objected, but the trial judge allowed the strikes without conducting a detailed analysis of whether race was a motivating factor.

