Blue Water Autonomy and Saildrone allege the Navy improperly excluded them from the Medium Unmanned Surface Vessel competition, raising new legal questions as the service accelerates autonomous fleet modernization.
WASHINGTON | Two prominent U.S. defense technology companies have filed federal lawsuits challenging the U.S. Navy's evaluation process for its next-generation Medium Unmanned Surface Vessel (MUSV) Family of Systems program, escalating a high-profile procurement dispute as the Pentagon pushes to rapidly expand autonomous maritime capabilities.
Blue Water Autonomy and Saildrone separately filed protests in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, alleging the Navy improperly eliminated them from the MUSV competition despite what both companies contend were fully compliant proposals.
The legal challenges could affect one of the Navy's most closely watched autonomous surface vessel initiatives, which is expected to play a significant role in future distributed maritime operations.
Companies Challenge Navy Evaluation Process
Blue Water Autonomy argues the Navy's evaluation relied on overly restrictive criteria and incorrectly interpreted its proposal.
According to the company's complaint, the service reached conclusions that were inconsistent with the MUSV solicitation and applicable statutory procurement requirements.
Much of the filing remains under seal, leaving many of the specific evaluation details unavailable to the public.
The Navy declined to comment, citing the pending litigation.







