The reported exchange intensifies scrutiny of Pentagon media policies as press-freedom advocates question whether military officials are selectively withholding information from critical reporters.
WASHINGTON | U.S. Central Command is facing new questions about its treatment of journalists after a public-affairs employee reportedly warned an investigative reporter that he could be placed on an internal “list of people to disregard.”
The disclosure was reported by The Intercept, which said Richard Allee, identified as an executive assistant in CENTCOM’s public-affairs office, acknowledged the existence of the list during a contentious telephone exchange. CENTCOM subsequently denied maintaining a journalist “blacklist,” leaving conflicting accounts about whether the command formally tracks reporters whose questions or calls officials intend to ignore.
According to The Intercept’s account, Allee warned reporter Nick Turse that repeatedly contacting the command could result in his being added to a “list of people to disregard.” When Turse asked whether such a list existed, Allee reportedly answered affirmatively but declined to identify the journalists or news organizations included.
“It’s not a list that we publicize,” Allee reportedly said.
CENTCOM later disputed that characterization in a written response, stating that the command does not maintain a “blacklist.” The command’s response did not fully explain what Allee meant, whether an informal do-not-engage directory exists or whether personnel receive instructions to avoid responding to particular journalists.
The competing statements raise broader questions about transparency, press access and the military’s responsibility to respond equitably to legitimate news inquiries—particularly during wartime.

